Tools › Guides › How to make flashcards that actually work
How to make flashcards that actually work
Why most flashcards are badly made, the rules that fix them, and how spaced repetition changes what you get for the same amount of time.
The short version
- One fact per card. A card with three things on it is three cards you
will get partly right and never fix.
- Make the question specific enough that there is exactly one correct
answer.
- Write them yourself. Making the card is a large part of the learning,
which is why downloaded decks work so much worse.
- Space the repetition. Reviewing what you already know is the most
common way to waste study time.
- Test yourself, do not read. Recall is the mechanism; recognition feels
like learning and is not.
Why most flashcards fail
Almost always one of three things.
The card has too much on it. "The causes of the First World War" is not a card, it is an essay. When you get it half right, there is no clear answer to whether you knew it, and the box it lands in is a guess. Split it: one card per cause.
The question is ambiguous. A card reading "1815" can be asking for Waterloo, the Congress of Vienna, or Napoleon's abdication. You will answer whichever you happen to think of and count it correct, and learn nothing.
The answer is recognisable rather than recalled. If the front contains a clue that makes the back obvious, you are practising recognition. It feels much easier than recall, and that ease is exactly the signal that it is not working.
The rules that fix it
Minimum information. Make each card the smallest thing that can be true or false on its own. Cards get shorter as you get better at making them.
Ask, do not state. "Photosynthesis converts light into ___" is a better card than "Photosynthesis: converting light into chemical energy", because the first requires production and the second permits recognition.
Avoid lists. A card asking for four things will be answered with three and counted as right. If you need a list, make one card per item, plus one card asking how many there are.
Include the context you will need. A card that only makes sense while you are in the chapter will be unanswerable in three weeks, which is when it will next appear.
Both directions, when both matter. For vocabulary, being able to go from the foreign word to your own is different from going the other way, and they are two separate skills. The flashcard tool here can reverse a deck, so make one deck and study it both ways rather than typing it twice.
Spaced repetition, and why it matters so much
The forgetting curve is steep and then flat: you lose most of what you learn within a day or two, and what survives that survives for much longer. A review placed just as a memory starts to fade does far more than the same review done earlier.
Practically, that means the best time to see a card is just before you would have forgotten it, and the best way to approximate that is a schedule that stretches every time you get it right.
The Leitner system is the simplest version that works: five boxes, a card moves up when you get it right and drops to the first when you get it wrong, and each box is reviewed less often than the one before. Your attention goes to the cards you do not know, which is the entire point, and is what studying a deck in order fails to do.
Building a deck without typing a hundred cards
This is the part that kills most attempts. Nobody types a hundred cards one at a time, which is why most decks are abandoned somewhere around card eight.
Paste instead. Two columns from a spreadsheet, a glossary from a document, a list from a website, any of those becomes a deck in one action. The tool on this site works the separator out for you, and shows the first card before you commit so a wrong guess is visible rather than discovered later.
Studying them properly
Say the answer before you turn the card. Out loud or in your head, but commit to it. Turning the card first and thinking "yes, I knew that" is the recognition trap again.
Be honest about "nearly". If you hesitated, you did not know it. Marking it wrong costs you one more review; marking it right costs you the fact.
Short and often beats long and rare. Fifteen minutes daily will beat two hours on Sunday, by a lot, and it is not close.
Star the ones that keep coming back. There are usually a handful of cards carrying most of the difficulty, and the night before something is the time to study only those.
When flashcards are the wrong tool
They are for facts: vocabulary, dates, formulae, definitions, anatomy, the periodic table. They are poor for anything where understanding matters more than recall, you cannot flashcard your way to following a proof, and trying produces someone who can recite the steps and cannot do the next one.
If you find yourself making cards for something that is really a process, work the process instead.